+1 from me, too. As to an :all shortcut that's synonymous with :exclude (), I think convenience at the REPL is a good argument for :all. (I'm assuming that the `require` macro would disappear, too.)
For Cosmin's thought (:as mutually exclusive with :exclude, :only, & :rename), it does seem to me that when one is aliasing a namespace, one wouldn't have a need to exclude or rename any functions (because there's no chance of conflict or namespace pollution). Does anyone disagree? I do like James Reeves suggestion, but only if it's easy enough to implement; also, it seems mostly like a trade of outer parens for inner brackets -- in the end you'll have the same number of wrapping characters... Perry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
