On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@laposte.net> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:30, Itay Maman wrote:
>
> > In Java6 @Override can also be attached to a method that overrides an
> > interface-declared method. So, the code is not supposed to compile w/
> > a Java5 compiler. As for the Java6 compiler, my guess is that your
> > compile is configured to be Java5 complaint. So I would suggest to
> > specify "-source 1.6" in the javac command line. Anyway, I will add it
> > to the build.xml file.
>
> Do you need Java 1.6 features? Clojure itself works fine with 1.5,
> and there are still machines around for which there is no 1.6 (my PPC
> Mac running MacOS 10.4, for example), so it would be nice if
> Waterfront could work with Java 1.5 as well.
No I don't need Java6. My Eclipse is configured to be Java6-compliant
so it generates
these @Overrides annotations automatically. I agree with your point.
I'll get rid of those.
Coming to think about it, I don't even need the Java code so much. It
is just a few classes
which realize some low-level UI stuff which seemed to be more natural
in Java than in Clojure.
I do want to translate them to Clojure at some point. This will solve
this issue altogether.
-Itay
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
