On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, MikeM <michael.messini...@invista.com> wrote: > > I read the part of your article (on lists and vectors) that you linked > to in another thread - > > In the list section you show the function into and conj as applied to > lists, but these can also be applied to vectors and will return > vectors, > > (into [1 2 3] [4 5]) => [1 2 3 4 5] > (conj [1 2 3] 4 5) => [1 2 3 4 5] > > so perhaps mention should be made in the vector section? or perhaps it > would be better to discuss that many functions take a seq-able > argument. Some will return a list if provided a vector, but into and > conj preserve the type of their argument.
At the end of the Vectors section I say this: "All the code examples provided above for lists also work for vectors." Do you think I should provide more detail than that? > Also, you mention that vectors are "not efficient when new items need > to be added or removed quickly", but subvec should perhaps be > mentioned as an exception. Can you elaborate on that? You might be teaching me something new. > You've taken on a formidable task in writing this article, please know > that these comments are meant to be constructive and not a criticism > of your work. Thanks! I appreciate all the feedback I can get. I've already made many updates to the article based on the feedback I've received. See http://ociweb.com/mark/clojure/. I'd be glad add more updates based on your feedback. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
