On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 9:40:12 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > If it follows Java bean semantics, you can use the `bean` function to view > it as a map with properties as keys. > The class is not actually a bean. It contains a map, with a .getPropertyValue method, but it doesn't implement Map.
Wouldn't it be better if ILookup were a protocol? >> > > Yes, it would be better. But this would require rewriting Clojure's lib as > protocols did not exist when it was written. > Is that very traumatic? Are protocols compiled into a Java interface? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
