Yeah, only Rich can really answer that question, right? :) But for me, Clojure is increasingly becoming cljc. When a library advertises compatibility in both clj and cljs, it just looks shinier to me. Feels like a trend for Clojure libraries in general. And if agents and STM were on cljs, I'd probably reach of those tools more often on both platforms.
On that note, if some Clojure concurrency magician would implement a lightweight threading library in cljc, which worked on both single-threaded cljs (offloading to webworkers where available) and JVM/CLR, allowing for STM on cljc... Hell, I'd throw down on a bounty for that. It would really bring cljs and clj into closer parity. And it would make cljs even more appetizing to js programmers. And it would reunite cljs with one of clj's original selling points - how immutability and persistent structures allow for unparalleled (lol) concurrency solutions. I almost got a rudimentary pmap thing working in cljs on core.async with webworkers by using a binding-hack macro I found online somewhere. I couldn't find great docs out there though on how to implement a lightweight threading library. On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:51 PM Didier <[email protected]> wrote: > The Specter post about if it should be made into core or not got me > wondering what makes Clojure Clojure. > > I'm trying to wrap my head around what is the most minimal set of things > that uniquely make up Clojure. > > Right now, in that set I've got: > > - The Clojure syntax and its semantics > - The Clojure special forms and their semantics > - The Clojure core libraries and their semantics > > So if I implemented a compiler that worked with the above set, it would be > a valid Clojure compiler. > > Now, ClojureScript appears to me like it is not Clojure, but a dialect of > it. I say that because it breaks some of the syntax semantics of Clojure, > like not allowing macros in the same namespace as functions. It also breaks > some of the core semantics, like def creating standard JS vars and not > Clojure Vars. In this respect, a language like hy-lang is also a Clojure > dialect, granted it shares even less of the Clojure set. > > Is ClojureCLR a dialect of Clojure, or is it a true Clojure implementation? > > One last thing that is interesting about Clojure versus other languages is > that it does not provide standard IO. These two things make it so that it > is kind of dependent on its host to complete its offering as a programming > language, which means any Clojure compiler will need to provide a mechanism > for IO. Those would always differ from Clojures to Clojures, so I don't > think that's part of what makes Clojure Clojure. > > What are others thoughts on this? > > P.S.: There's no point to this thread, its mostly curiosity. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
