Thank you, Alex. That makes sense. What is the main use case for walk?
On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 3:16:42 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Usually the walk solution for transformation is easiest with postwalk: > > (require '[clojure.walk :refer [postwalk]]) > > (defn m-to-v [m] > (if (map? m) > (mapcat > (fn [[k v :as e]] > (if (coll? v) > (mapv #(into [k] %1) v) > [e])) > m) > m)) > > (postwalk m-to-v data) > > > > On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 11:38:18 AM UTC-6, [email protected] > <javascript:> wrote: >> >> >> Given this: >> >> {:positive :true {30 {4 {50 43, 1000 32}, 6 {40 12, 90 2}, 8 {777 23, >> 9090 1}}} >> >> I'd like a series of arrays that I can feed into (reduce) so I can easily >> sum them: >> >> [ 30 4 50 43 ] >> >> [ 30 4 1000 32 ] >> >> [ 30 6 40 12 ] >> >> [ 30 6 90 2 ] >> >> [ 30 8 777 23 ] >> >> [ 30 8 9090 1 ] >> >> I've been trying to work this out using "walk" recursively, but then I >> wondered if perhaps I am missing something obvious? Does Clojure offer a >> straightforward way to do this? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
