hello, i hope this is the place to discuss questions about Quil (i couldn't 
find a dedicated forum)

and first of all, kudos to Nikita for this incredible library, which i find 
even better than the original Processing
it's not just a matter of using a different syntax than java, but Nikita 
actually created something more powerful and flexible than Processing

i'm particularly fond of the middleware functionality, which is a stroke of 
genius: so simple in retrospect and so powerful, opening a whole new way of 
possibilities of structuring one's own work in a modular fashion

so i have one question regarding live coding and middleware

if i redefine a function that i associate to :setup, :update or :draw keys, 
i can see my running sketch changing on the fly, reflecting the new 
definitions

this is not the case however if i redefine a function that i use as a 
middleware

is it an intrinsic limitation? would it be possible to extend the live 
coding behaviour to middlewares as well?

thanks and long live Quil,
Jay

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to