I had't realized this was the case. I was fooled by the fact that conformed
values often are the same as the unconformed value. That changed in the fdef
where the the arg is enclosed in a seq. My spec setup didn't work as is, but
the work around (s/cat :arg ::my spec) as the first predicate in the s/and
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.