I wrote the original patch, but now that it's been 2 years I don't really support it anymore. There are lots of ways one could build up an oversized stack with lazy seqs. Concat might be the most common, but it's only one possibility. I think it's better to have consistent behavior than to have a bunch of ad hoc cases.
I could see an argument though for a version of concat that is strict in its first parameter, kinda like foldl' vs foldl in haskell, and that wouldn't require any changes to the underlying runtime classes. On Friday, September 15, 2017 at 8:40:38 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: > > Yes, that. I have too much stuff in the air to juggle patches here. Jira > would be great. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
