ASM: I haven't done anything with ASM before. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
What I have in mind is using the org.ow2.asm, not the internal clojure.asm. I am imagining I can take a function's class and add 'implements IObj', a 'meta' field, and the necessary methods, and pass through everything else unchanged. I then ought to be reasonably insensitive to changes in how functions are implemented, but not completely. I would definitely be depending on IObj, which is not part of the public Clojure API. So there's no guarantee anything implemented this way would continue to work in a new release. That might be a reasonable risk to tradeoff with higher performance, however. There's also a chicken and egg thing here: The Clojure API shouldn't commit to anything without a good reason. But you can't demonstrate that there's a good reason without realistic code that shows what's possible with that commitment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.