So, at the point where you need 2 things to be consecutive, wrap them up in
a vector so they're one thing. `(partition-all 2)` will return a transducer
xform that chunks up your message stream by 2
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/partition-all, and if you need to undo
it you can do so with the `cat` transducer
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/cat .

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:42 AM JokkeB <jahve...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the response. That's what I suspected.
>
> How does partition help me in this case? I can't see any way of using it.
>
> How about onto-chan, would that be deterministic? Or any other function?
>
>
> tiistai 10. lokakuuta 2017 17.33.22 UTC+3 Gary Trakhman kirjoitti:
>
>> I think a core assumption is that all writes can yield control at any
>> time to other worker go processes.  I wouldn't rely on the consecutive
>> behavior even if it were true, nondeterminism is a good assumption with
>> core.async.  If you need that particular guarantee, consider a call to
>> partition?
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:30 AM JokkeB <jahv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> I'm wondering about a case when using async:
>>>
>>> I have a channel where I write from multiple threads. One of the sources
>>> is a go-loop with a timeout, so each second I write something to the
>>> channel. If I do two consecutive writes inside the go block, can another
>>> thread write between the two writes? Or can I rely on the two messages
>>> being consecutive in the channel?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to