Your example does work, but it returns the conformed value [a b c] out of the macro, which the compiler then tries to evaluate. So the exception is coming downstream.
See: user=> (macroexpand '(test-macro a b c)) [a b c] On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 1:08:22 AM UTC-6, Stanislav Yurin wrote: > > Hi, > Please help me understand following behavior. > Speccing macro via fdef and calling explain within a macro works, but > conform tries to resolve all symbols. > How to correctly conform macro body from within a macro? > > Longer example: > > This works: > > (spec/def ::test-spec (spec/* any?)) > > (spec/fdef test-macro > :args ::test-spec > :ret any?) > > (defmacro test-macro [& body] > (println body)) > > (test-macro a b c) > (a b c) > => nil > > > > > This works: > > (defmacro test-macro [& body] > (spec/explain ::test-spec body)) > > > (test-macro a b c) > Success! > => nil > > > This doesn't: > > > > (defmacro test-macro [& body] > (spec/conform ::test-spec body)) > > > > (test-macro a b c) > CompilerException java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve symbol: a > in this context > > > > > Stanislav. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
