Sorry for the late response, I had somehow disabled notifications from this thread.
Thank you for your answers. I am far from a legal expert, but I had to do some research about the licensing matters as I am in a bit of a dead end situation: I work for an NGO that works a lot with European projects and has a quite strict copyleft policy. In most new projects we land, we try to push Clojure as the prefered language. However we realised that we might have severe legal implications trying to licence our software with AGPL. Probably we should take our case to a legal expert to see if there is any smart way around it. That's why I thought that EPL2.0 could have given us a (slightly) more straightforward solution but I do understand the challenges and implications that come with it. Thanks for filling the issues, will follow the updates. On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 22:06:19 UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-6, Daniel Compton wrote: >> >> >> Alex: it looks like this was your email about concerns >> <http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists//epl-discuss/msg00043.html> you >> and Rich had. I can see Mike Milinkovich had some followups with answers, >> do they satisfy your concerns about the definition of derivative works? >> > > I was sending along Rich's concerns there, so I can't really say whether > they address his concerns or not. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
