Perfect. I'm still learning my way around, so I overlooked the obvious. Thanks!
On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 9:36:14 AM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Yes, I think multispec is one option, or just s/or of course (when > conformed, that will give you a tag telling you which one it is, which > might be useful). The other consideration is that the multispec is based on > a multimethod so it can be externally extended later rather than by > modifying an existing spec. But maybe that's unimportant for you. > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 8:19:13 AM UTC-6, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: >> >> I'm really diving into spec now, and I'd like to have a spec that covers >> successful http responses, but also allows me to conform different body >> content. >> >> For example, in one case I just expect raw html, but in another, JSON >> with a specific structure. >> >> Are spec multimethods the correct way to do this, or are there other >> options? >> >> I considered have different 'body' specs with names that make sense, but >> since the spec name must match the key name, the specs all have to be >> 'body', correct? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
