there are (at least) 2 Qis:

one is java-aop.

the other is lisp++.

sincerely.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I antended a talk on Qi at JavaZone 2008.
>
> Qi is a kind of AOP layer that knits together concerns via a bit of
> configuration and some naming conventions.  I'm a bit fuzzy on the
> details 6 months out.
>
> A lot of the AOP solutions for Java are trying to introduce concepts
> that are more native in a Lisp.  I'm sure there's quite a lot of good
> ideas there, but there's a lot of others that probably don't fit.
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> could be applicable in Clojure.  From what I gathered from the tweets
>>> from Qcon, Qi was mentioned again there.  Does anyone know if there
>>> was anything more to it than "it would be nice"?
>>
>> (fwiw, Mark T. talked about it a bit on the Qi list.
>>
>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/Qilang/search?group=Qilang&q=clojure&qt_g=Search+this+group)
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to