Yeah, this makes perfect sense on second thought. I still think this should be emphasised more, somewhere. On every introduction to closure you will find, you're told to use the svn version. So maybe there should be a big remainder on the api docs page saying "This is not the doc for the SVN version, check the last changes here"
This would at least prevent dumb unexperienced newbs like me to post useless things in the mailing list ! On Mar 18, 10:36 pm, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote: > the api doc documents the latest release of clojure, which is the > pre-lazy release from back in december I believe. > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Notfonk <raph.ami...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > i'm not sure this is the right place to post that > > > Could you please remove lazy-cons from the api doc ? I'm a newbie to > > clojure, and i may be a little dumb, but i spent 1 hour searching for > > it and wondering what was wrong before i saw in Clojure >> lazy that > > it was deprecated > > > Thanks for this wonderfull language ! > > -- > And what is good, Phaedrus, > And what is not good— > Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
