On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com> wrote:
> Because parallel bindings are also useful, I think it's an interesting idea
> to extend let to allow it to take parallel bindings in a map instead of a
> vector. These would act like Common Lisp's "let":
>
> (def a 4)
> (let {a 1 b a c 3}
> (prn a b c))
>
> 1 4 3
Can't you already do this with:
(let [[a b c] [1 a 3]]
(prn a b c))
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
