On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rich Hickey <[email protected]> wrote:
> If someone's going to do an object system for Clojure, it > should be one in which the entire state of an object is available as a > value. I can see that. it's sort of like the command vs. query dichotomy expressed for, say, Eiffel needs to be augmented. Queries are straight forward. But "commands" return new object (clojures) that behave the new way the command prescribed. ... so, in a way, they are just queries, too. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
