On Mar 24, 2009, at 16:00, Mark Volkmann wrote: > Thanks! It looks like I don't need the let now.
Indeed. > Does a macro have to evaluate to one form? For example, this works, > but it seems I can't > drop the do. Yes, a macro has to evaluate to one form. This is actually not so much a condition on macros as a consequence of the fact that a macro, like any function, has a single return value. What else could that reasonably be but a form? Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
