Because update-in can use any function to do the update. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, mifrai <fraim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, > > I was wondering why there was no "update" to "update-in"? But there is > an "assoc" to "assoc-in" and a "get" to a "get-in". > > - Mike > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
