2009/5/10 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> > Hi Laurent, > > Am 10.05.2009 um 07:19 schrieb Laurent PETIT: > > No problem, but you can still consider (for the definition of the >> function) the equivalent higher-order version I provided later in the my >> post (you didn't answer to this one): >> >> (defn repeatedly-while [no-arg-pred f] >> (take-while (fn [ _ ] (no-arg-pred) f)) >> >> whose usage is the same as Meikel's one, >> > > This is not equivalent to my version. The calling site > looks the same, but it still consumes one element of > the seq before evaluating the predicate. That is the > way take-while works. But it doesn't help in the given > reader example, since you read before checking, > whether the reader is actually ready... >
Wooops, you're totally right, > > Sincerely > Meikel > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
