Hi Matt,

I would like to move this to contrib, if you will sign the CA. I'll be  
moving my simple binding-based stubs to use this and will send along  
suggestions if I have any.

Thanks for writing this!

Stu

P.S. Apologies if variants of this message show up twice. Mail client  
wonkiness...

> When I started working on this library, I thought to myself, "I can't
> believe no one has put together an expectation/mocking library" but I
> couldn't find one so I went ahead and started my own.  Of course, it
> was not until I had an early working version that I discovered Allen
> Rohner's expectation tools, but I figured that mine were sufficiently
> different to merit further development (at least relative to the
> latest code of his I could find).
>
> In the past week or so I've been refactoring and fixing bugs on my
> test-expect library and I find it much improved over what I previously
> had.  The salient improvements on the latest on trunk include:
>
> - Removal of dependency on test-is.  Tests have been moved to a
> separate file instead.  The library is still geared toward easy
> integration with test-is, but the explicit dependency is gone.
>
> - Replaced "exceptions on error" with the new and improved error
> functions that are ready to be overridden or used as-is.  They also
> include reporting the expected behavior in an unevaluated form, a la
> test-is.
>
> - Added convenience methods such as (once) (more-than x) for
> invocation count and argument matching.\
>
> - Default has-args argument matchers to being equality matchers so you
> can say (has-args [5]) instead of (has-args [#(= 5 %)])
>
> - Bug fixes
>
> The latest is available for public consumption at 
> http://code.google.com/p/test-expect/
> Basically the gist of it is it sets up the bindings for any functions
> you'd rather not touch while testing the function you're working on.
> So, you just say:
>
> (expect [dep-fn1 (has-args [5 (less-than 4)] (returns "a string!"))]
> (fn-under-test-which-calls-dep-fn1))
>
> Any unexpected or unmatched calls are reported.  Successful execution
> is silent, which mirrors other libraries I have used in other
> languages. Further details to be found in the source.
>
> Suggestions for further changes or improvements are more than
> welcome.  If people find this library useful I'd be more than happy to
> sign the CA and put this in contrib. Also, Allen, if you are
> interested in merging our efforts let me know.  Is your latest code
> available?
>
> -Matt
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to