hmm... developing clojure code using eclipse makes you poor. :) On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, verec < jeanfrancois.brouil...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > A bit facetious, I know, but a not too sarcastic pun on the > current economic climate ... > > foreclojure > > :-) > > Has good Googleability too :-) > > On Jun 23, 5:21 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What about eclipjure ? > > > > 2009/6/23 Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Laurent PETIT < > laurent.pe...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > >> 2009/6/23 Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> > > > > >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Laurent PETIT < > laurent.pe...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > >>>> * eclojure (named after nothing, but an interesting contraction of > the > > >>>> beginning of ECLipse and CLOJURE). > > > > >>> maybe too close to enclojure. > > > > >> yeah maybe, but would that be a bad thing ? > > > > > I'm concerned about googlability. "Did you mean enclojure Top 2 results > > > shown" > > > -- Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
