Newbie question here. Probably answered in Stu's book, but I forgot it at home today.
is: (for [x [1 2 3]] `(some-symbol ~x)) dangerous? I mean, assuming that some-symbol is bound and all. At the REPL I get ((user/some-symbol 1) (user/some-symbol 2) (user/some-symbol 3)) which is what I'm interested in getting, but somehow the fact that "for" is a macro and I'm escaping x assuming it's there is disconcerting. Thanks for any style tips... Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
