> Does anyone know a straightforward way to create a constructor using > gen-class that takes an argument of the same class as the class you're > generating?
I've actually hit a related problem: a generated class cannot have type annotations for itself (because, as you've noticed, the class doesn't exist yet), and thus ends up using reflection when calling its own inherited methods. I end up annotating the 'this' argument with the superclass name, but of course that's not strictly correct. > On a different note, is there a capitalization convention for classes > created with gen-class? Is it CamelCase since they're java classes for > all intents and purposes? Or hyphen-case since we want to spread the > love? I use PascalCase. (camelCase is where there's a hump in the middle.) ;) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
