Well, that's what I am talking about. It can be controlled, but it
requires good grasp of all the concepts and high concentration + there
is still a chance to miss something. Now it may not be such a problem
since the majority of people who use clojure are usually highly
motivated enthusiasts, but I can smell problems there when Clojure
becomes more popular...
So, yes, that warning could be useful.

On Jul 25, 12:52 am, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Passing a collection to a function that expects a lazy seq is not
> always an error. The seq library encourages it by calling (seq) on
> those collections for you. I suppose all lazy functions could emit a
> warning when they have to call (seq) on their arguments, based on some
> global variable like *warn-on-non-lazy-seq*, similar to *warn-on-
> reflection*. However, I don't have a good grasp on whether these types
> of mistakes are widespread enough to warrant such a change.
>
> On Jul 24, 10:50 am, Dragan Djuric <draga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there an automatic way to discover such error? These types of
> > errors could be discovered by the compiler. How am I going to see if I
> > get an ISeq in my clojure code? I would have to dig...
>
> > On Jul 24, 3:37 pm, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 24, 6:17 am, Dragan Djuric <draga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Sometimes (or maybe always?) it is mentioned in the doc. In my
> > > > opinion, this is one of the cases where dynamic languages do not
> > > > excel. If we had typing, that would be solved by implementing Lazy
> > > > "interface".
>
> > > We do have types and we do have a lazy interface. The lazy interface
> > > is ISeq.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to