Interesting. So I take it that these are (or should be) entirely a speed optimization? i.e, most the time, you'd want to write your code using the normal persistent data structures, and only go back and implement this within specific functions if they're a bottleneck? Sounds great.
And for a somewhat crazy thought.. it seems like using them would be as easy as adding an exclamation point to all the modification functions. So you could easily wrap an entirely functional code block in a transform-to-transient macro that translates the functions to their transient counterparts, and gain all the performance benefits? Thanks, -Luke On Aug 3, 5:25 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been doing some work on Transient Data Structures. You can read > about them here: > > http://clojure.org/transients > > Feedback welcome, > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
