On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Andy Fingerhut<andy_finger...@alum.wustl.edu> wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2:36 pm, Aaron Cohen <remled...@gmail.com> wrote: >> At that point is it possible you're just paying the price of >> PersistentVector for the "bodies" vector? Does it improve much if you >> change bodies to an array? > > About 7% faster changing bodies to a Java array of java.lang.Object's, > each of which happens to be a Java array of primitive doubles, as > before. Now about 3.0 x Java run time. > > http://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-benchmarks/blob/43ed2f42e6c1485541532e51eacc66488949c658/RESULTS >
I'm actually glad that the difference is that small there. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
