On Sep 4, 1:38 pm, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > You have to be prepared to deal with potential inconsistencies: a > closure (or any object) can hold a reference to the value of a > function.
In some circumstances, I am careful to pass vars rather than fns, if I know they are going to be held. That makes things easier during development, and when I want to roll in updates in production. - Chas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
