> Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate > it.
+1 - I'd be interested in using it. - Adrian. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Sean Devlin<francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Could you put it on GitHub anyway? It would be a good way to evaluate > it. > > On Sep 10, 12:36 am, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Would anyone have any interest in a content negotiation library making >> its way into contrib? >> >> That is, a library with a public function that takes an Accept: header >> from an HTTP request, and your server-side preferences, and spits out >> which Content-Type you should produce. >> >> This is important for "proper REST" apps. (I don't see any >> functionality like this in Compojure.) >> >> I have one about 80% done (compared to one I wrote in Python). Pure >> Clojure; the only dependency is on str-utils. >> >> If there's no interest in it getting into contrib, I'll just stick it >> on GitHub. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
