Hi, On Sep 30, 12:19 am, Cliff Wells <cliff.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In short, you've taken something that was originally CPU-bound and made it > I/O-bound. I don't think so. The measured times do not include the println. The loop with the print will itself run longer, but the average time printed does not count the print. I would expect something like code elimination (the computed value is not used) or some other JIT-voodoo to happen in one case and for some reason not in the other. See Cliff Click's presentation on busted benchmarks. I don't have the link handy, but it should be in one of the more recent of the thousand timing threads. Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
