On Oct 2, 11:52 am, Mark Tomko <mjt0...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, outside the scope of a function, it seems that it's possible > for bindings to be redefined later in a file without causing an > immediate error. This could easily lead to mistakes that would > manifest as silent and potentially inexplicable behavior later.
Clojure, like most Lisps, expends less effort to protect programmers from mistakes than, say, Java. And for interactive development, it's essential to be able to replace a function definition. -SS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
