gL wrote: > The solution only works with a var name that equals to a Clojure name > (here "max").
That's because (binding) only works with a var that already exists, it doesn't create a new one. To create your own var (instead of abusing a clojure core one) just use "with-local-vars" instead of "binding" and "var-set" instead of "set!". But generally it's much easier to do it in a functional way making using of lazy sequence functions. > How do you access an element at a given place in a lazy sequence in a > more idiomatic way? (nth (lex-permutations [0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]) 999999) [Indexing starts at 0 so we use 999999 instead of 1000000.] Cheers, Alex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
