Hi, On Oct 14, 10:59 am, Garth Sheldon-Coulson <g...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Finally, am I right that another reason to use explicit arguments, not > dynamic binding, to pass the options is that if I ever convert my internal > (map ...) calls to (pmap ...) calls the dynamic bindings would be lost on > account of the function calls being handled by other threads? This would also be covered by bound-fn. Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
