Jeff Valk <jv-li...@tx.rr.com> writes: > On Wednesday 14 October 2009 at 12:16 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > >> If you've got complicated changes you can create a github fork and ask >> to pull from there, but for simple things email is fine. Though if you >> want attribution for your patch you can use "git format-patch" to >> generate your it; then your authorship will be recorded by git. > > No attribution necessary. Thanks for the great work you, Jeffrey, and > Lennart have done with clojure-mode and swank-clojure. Are future pull > requests best directed to technomancy, jochu, or both?
I (technomancy) am more actively involved in maintenance than jochu. I have commit access to his clojure-mode repo, so just send those patches my way. Currently with swank there are some changes on his branch that I haven't been able to get working properly, so maybe for functionality there it would be best if you wait till I have a chance to merge them, sorry. Do you have any specific ideas for new features? thanks, Phil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
