I'm not quite sure why you would want to say
(take n (repeatedly fn))
It appears to me that a fn called 'repeatedly' is really
being executed for its side-effects. If you are interested
in a sequence of values being returned from fn, then
make fn return a lazy sequence and 'take' will work on the
result sequence without 'repeatedly'.
Can you give us an example of how you're using 'repeatedly' with take?
regards,
-tom
On Nov 18, 4:24 pm, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> when people use (take n (repeatedly fn)) are there other ways they
> might have written that in clojure? it just seems like more ascii than
> should be required :-)
>
> e.g. not exactly the same but bigloo has
> list-tabulatehttp://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/doc/bigloo-7.html#list-tabulate
>
> gracias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
