Well, I'm not fluent with git yet. I'll create the github project, that can not be hard.
In comparison with Prevayler, the persister does not block the reads, because it relies on Clojure STM. However it blocks the writes as Prevayler, because currently there is no way to reliably get/ generate a transaction id without locking. I think it's possible to modify Clojure STM to return a global transaction id. Then locking inside the persister can be omitted and writes will not be blocking each other. Probably it's not as important now, when the most of today computers have <=8 cores and the typical usage pattern is that there are an order of magnitude more reads than writes. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Pelle Braendgaard <pel...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was just starting to research if there was a prevayler like solution > for clojure. Thanks. > > I'll start playing with it. > > Do you have a github project for it yet? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
