I'm glad that everything works now Greg. Though I have to say that I'm a little suspicious of changing a "doseq" into a "for" to solve the problem. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any subtleties that can arise because of doseq and tail recursion. Is it possible to post a simplified version of your code that exhibits the same problem? I feel there might be something else at play here.
-Patrick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
