Thanks for the links, the last gives a good summary. I think newlisp is great for scripting, if i were on the jvm on a large project I'd use clojure, but for tasks that I might use ruby,python, or perl for i find newlisp refreshingly clean and direct.
It may be warty, if warty means practical. Clojure is practical too yet here described as an abomination, http://www.loper-os.org/?p=42 - it's too bad folks trying to get work done get a bad wrap from those in ivory towers. bd On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:06 -0800, Richard Newman wrote: > > newLISP > > I've seen enough about newLISP to not bother. > > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/257#comment-1901 > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/39a9e50aa548637f > > http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/20/newlisp-an-intriguing-dialect-of-lisp/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
