On 19 Jan, 08:33, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Just one thought, since I also tried to convert some emacs lisp code > to clojure recently ( paredit.el ). > > It seemed a good idea at first, something like : > > 1. I write a one-to-on conversion, using the same idioms that are used > in CL in clojure > 2. I write a bunch of non-regression tests > 3. I rewrite as much as is necessary so that it becomes idiomatic > clojure and not "CL in clojure". ( remember how some people coming > from C world used to write "C-in-java" ? )
I know the feeling, because I am very much in the same place. Some things about Clojure I'm just loving and believe I'm getting idiomatically right (maps and keys as functions, orthogonal collections, list comprehension), but other things I'm just not fully groking yet (software transactional memory, for example) It will come, I think!
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
