In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is
the #1 problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both
ordinary function and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-
considered patch implementing this would be accepted.
SS: is require* an acceptable name for the function version?
Stu
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens.
Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not a
macro) is important for code-generating code.
-SS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
