Looking at your post I notice some things that strike me as 'odd'. The use of (def) in a form that is not a top most form. From my experience this leads to trouble in the best of times. I think a better way would be to close over your known-map with a closure.
While I don't have high hopes that closing over known-map will solve your out of memory issue it starts, i believe, making the code more idiomatic. Once that is done I would look at simplifying what update- known-map and dist functions do. Its unclear to me why you do a merge of a zipmap of keys to numbers. Making that clearer might help. I also don't understand your use of a map to hold the intermediate solutions. My first thought upon reading the question was a pair of numbers, the first being the number and the second being the count of the Collatz chain would do the trick, but I could be missing something. (William Hidden) On Feb 10, 10:13 am, Aviad Reich <avi....@gmail.com> wrote: > thank you. > I have "-server" and "-Xmx1024m" set in my 'swank-clojure-extra-vm-args, but > the problem remains. > > Aviad > > On 10 February 2010 15:57, Joop Kiefte <iko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > (Disclaimer: never tried myself) > >http://hausheer.osola.com/docs/5 > > > 2010/2/10 Aviad R <avi....@gmail.com> > > > Hi all. > > >> I'm trying to learn clojure with the excellent "Programming Clojure" > >> and projecteuler.net. I am encountering the java heap space error, and > >> can't find a workaround, nor a smarter way to write my code (which I > >> am certain exist). > > >> Trying to solve Problem 14 (some spoilers might be ahead, for those > >> wanting to solve it in the future). > > >> The problem and my code are inhttps://pastee.org/hj3sh > > >> here is the problem: > >> I am trying to produce a map of one O(million) key-value pairs using a > >> recursive function. > > >> I can produce a map of the first 100000 numbers in ~1300 msecs, with > >> 217211 keys. > >> However, for 150000 and up, I get java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java > >> heap space. > > >> so, I assume my code is ok on efficiency, but the recursion is too > >> deep. > > >> am I right? can anyone suggest a way to overcome this problem? > >> any additional tips and thoughts on the code would be of great help to > >> me, as I am making my first steps in clojure. > > >> Thank you, > >> Aviad > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "Clojure" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > >> your first post. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> > > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- > > Communication is essential. So we need decent tools when communication is > > lacking, when language capability is hard to acquire... > > > -http://esperanto.net -http://esperanto-jongeren.nl > > > Linux-user #496644 (http://counter.li.org) - first touch of linux in 2004 > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
