can we creat threads in clojure?

On Feb 11, 8:11 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is about the overloading of the "object based" expression.
>
> A step forward could be to recognize that:
>  * Java is a weak/simplified version of a class based language
> (simplifications made for several well known reasons: ease of adoption
> by C/C++ crowd: - algol like syntax-, reduced functionalities for
> debatable reasons: e.g. no C++ multiple
> inheritence/templates/pointers-, not fully class based for debatable
> performance reasons: primitive types, not everything is a class
> method). It did at least have the good property of popularizing the
> JVM and the notion of garbage collection, to cite the most evident to
> me.
>  * Javascript (at least in its ancestral forms, don't know for sure
> since the later ECMA standardizations) is a prototype based language
> => true object orientation, methods "belong" to objects, not to their
> classes (by belong, I mean one can redefine methods on an object
> basis)
>  * Smalltalk is a pure class based language. No static methods in
> smalltalk, thanks to its correct use of the meta-class concept.
>
>  * Clojure is a pragmatic language, function based, with a clear story
> for managing the parts of your application which require manipulation
> of internal (essential) state, or external (I/O resources) state.
>
> I don't know if it is at all possible to map the "concept" of "object
> orientation" to one category and not the other ...
>
> 2010/2/11 Jeff Schwab <j...@schwabcenter.com>:
>
>
>
> > Joel Westerberg wrote:
>
> >> You can work with java objects. But clojure itself is not object oriented,
> >> because it's functional, and object orientation requires state 
> >> manipulation.
>
> > By whose definition?  Are you saying there is no such thing as an immutable
> > object?
>
> >> Other lisps support object orientation, common-lisp for example.
>
> > Clojure is not purely functional.  In fact, it has special support for
> > managing mutable state in coherent ways.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> > first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to