Yes, that's what I meant :) .
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Brendan Ribera
<brendan.rib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You should be able to do (assoc p :x 3), you should get back #:Posn{:x
>> 1, :y 2}
>
> You meant that you get back #:Posn{:x 3, :y 2}, right? Sounds reasonable to
> me.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
