Hi, On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 08:32:42AM -0800, Martin Hauner wrote:
> > (cond > > (empty? rolls) 0 > > (strike? rolls) (+ (score-strike rolls) (score-after-strike rolls)) > > (spare? rolls) (+ (score-spare rolls) (score-after-frame rolls)) > > (more? rolls) (+ (score-frame rolls) (score-after-frame rolls))) > > Someone suggested to use a (binding) to avoid the repeating rolls > parameter. He wasn't sure if > it would be ok (learning too). > Since I have to change the code to calculate (score) in parallel > anyway it may be ok to make > rolls thread locale!? I think the cond – as you did – is the best way to go. condp is supposed to be used with a single predicate testing against different values. The suggested condp forms are pushing this a little bit too much, IMHO. How binding could used in this case is rather unclear to me… Just me two 0.02€. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
