On 21 February 2010 20:58, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah yes, that makes more sense :)
Yes, the first version I've posted was written precisely so as to obscure my point. :-) >> I'm using a newer commit (49a7d6b8e14050a45df5332e768ba6647752215d), >> but this shouldn't make any difference. > > No, I only mentioned the commit I was using since I wasn't seeing what > you said you saw. I wouldn't expect there to be a difference in how > it works between versions 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Agreed. All best, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
