On Mar 3, 2:05 pm, Jarkko Oranen <chous...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, it seems to me that the "universal interface" is the sequence. > Turns out many things can be represented as sequences. :) And since > maps are just collections of key/value pairs, very generic code can be > written to process them, too. As long as the wanted keys are there, > any extra information the map might be carrying can often be ignored.
So is it generally the case that people implement "objects" as maps? That's what I've been doing in my dabblings with the language so far and it seems flexible enough. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
