On 4 March 2010 10:19, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > As many of you know, I've always been tepid on lein. I'd rather go > with Maven whole-hog, because that offers the most robust model for > incorporating Java libraries.
Out of interest, what scenarios does Maven account for that Leiningen currently does not? > The more we can leverage the Java tool set, the better. I'd rather > lein were just a thin POM generator for those who can't stand writing > XML. I personally favour the opposite approach :). Whilst Java provides a lot of useful functionality, I've never been particularly impressed with the way most Java libraries are designed. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
