On 15 March 2010 21:53, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, but maybe the point of Meikel is that doing so may (?) be relying > on undocumented implementation detail ... ?
Well, I don't think so -- that passage I quoted from ensure's docs seems to be an attempt at documenting it. In fact, as far as I can tell, this is the single purpose of ensure. OTOH, if my mental picture of what's going in is correct, I guess I'd be in favour of an extra clarification effort on that docstring... Then again I'm still in the process of thinking over what I saw today (w.r.t. STM), so maybe it just needs some time to sink in. Sincerely, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
