On 28/03/2010, at 8:01 PM, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > - Clojure code manipulating poloyglot's notation is more complex > because it must be parsed first, and then recombined. Leiningen's > notation already is 'parsed'.
Partly parsed. The most 'correct' form would be [groupdId artifactId version] i.e. not conflating the groupId and artifactId into a single lexical value. > - Editing just the version of a dependency (or the project itself) is > a fairly common occurrence and is somewhat more awkward if you're > editing only *part* of a string literal, rather than a single token. I prefer the forms that don't invent new lexical constructs. For a start they're more amenable to manipulation using direct language facilities. Antony Blakey ------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
